↓ Skip to main content

A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees

Overview of attention for article published in Central European Journal of Operations Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees
Published in
Central European Journal of Operations Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10100-017-0479-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bogumił Kamiński, Michał Jakubczyk, Przemysław Szufel

Abstract

In the paper, we consider sequential decision problems with uncertainty, represented as decision trees. Sensitivity analysis is always a crucial element of decision making and in decision trees it often focuses on probabilities. In the stochastic model considered, the user often has only limited information about the true values of probabilities. We develop a framework for performing sensitivity analysis of optimal strategies accounting for this distributional uncertainty. We design this robust optimization approach in an intuitive and not overly technical way, to make it simple to apply in daily managerial practice. The proposed framework allows for (1) analysis of the stability of the expected-value-maximizing strategy and (2) identification of strategies which are robust with respect to pessimistic/optimistic/mode-favoring perturbations of probabilities. We verify the properties of our approach in two cases: (a) probabilities in a tree are the primitives of the model and can be modified independently; (b) probabilities in a tree reflect some underlying, structural probabilities, and are interrelated. We provide a free software tool implementing the methods described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 361 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Researcher 16 4%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 120 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 67 19%
Engineering 59 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 133 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,203,106
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Central European Journal of Operations Research
#3
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,528
of 317,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Central European Journal of Operations Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them