↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Imaging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 233)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer
Published in
Clinical and Translational Imaging, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40336-017-0231-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amarnath Challapalli, Laurence Carroll, Eric O. Aboagye

Abstract

Hypoxia is a condition of insufficient oxygen to support metabolism which occurs when the vascular supply is interrupted, or when a tumour outgrows its vascular supply. It is a negative prognostic factor due to its association with an aggressive tumour phenotype and therapeutic resistance. This review provides an overview of hypoxia imaging with Positron emission tomography (PET), with an emphasis on the biological relevance, mechanism of action, highlighting advantages, and limitations of the currently available hypoxia radiotracers. A comprehensive PubMed literature search was performed, identifying articles relating to biological significance and measurement of hypoxia, MRI methods, and PET imaging of hypoxia in preclinical and clinical settings, up to December 2016. A variety of approaches have been explored over the years for detecting and monitoring changes in tumour hypoxia, including regional measurements with oxygen electrodes placed under CT guidance, MRI methods that measure either oxygenation or lactate production consequent to hypoxia, different nuclear medicine approaches that utilise imaging agents the accumulation of which is inversely related to oxygen tension, and optical methods. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are reviewed, along with individual strategies for validating different imaging methods. PET is the preferred method for imaging tumour hypoxia due to its high specificity and sensitivity to probe physiological processes in vivo, as well as the ability to provide information about intracellular oxygenation levels. Even though hypoxia could have significant prognostic and predictive value in the clinic, the best method for hypoxia assessment has in our opinion not been realised.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Chemistry 16 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 41 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,820,585
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#17
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,119
of 310,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them