| Title |
Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation during and after eccentric cycling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-013-2816-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Peñailillo, Anthony Blazevich, Kazunori Nosaka |
| Abstract |
This study compared concentric cycling (CONC) and two bouts of eccentric cycling (ECC1, ECC2) for substrate utilisation and resting energy expenditure (REE). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 70% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 51% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,378,711
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,465
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,715
of 318,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.