↓ Skip to main content

IMMUNIZATION OF BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG AGAINST PLAGUE THROUGH CONSUMPTION OF VACCINE-LADEN BAITS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IMMUNIZATION OF BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG AGAINST PLAGUE THROUGH CONSUMPTION OF VACCINE-LADEN BAITS
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, October 2008
DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-44.4.930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonie E. Rocke, Susan R. Smith, Dan T. Stinchcomb, Jorge E. Osorio

Abstract

Prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) are highly susceptible to Yersinia pestis and, along with other wild rodents, are significant reservoirs of plague for other wildlife and humans in the western United States. A recombinant raccoon poxvirus, expressing the F1 antigen of Y. pestis, was incorporated into a palatable bait and offered to three groups (n = 18, 19, and 20) of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) for voluntary consumption, either one, two, or three times, at roughly 3-wk intervals. A control group (n = 19) received baits containing raccoon poxvirus without the inserted antigen. Mean antibody titers to Y. pestis F1 antigen increased significantly in all groups ingesting the vaccine-laden baits, whereas the control group remained negative. Upon challenge with virulent Y. pestis, immunized groups had higher survival rates (38%) than the unimmunized control group (11%). The mean survival time of groups ingesting vaccine-laden baits either two or three times was significantly higher than that of animals ingesting vaccine-laden baits just one time and of animals in the control group. These results show that oral immunization of prairie dogs against plague provides some protection against challenge at dosages that simulate simultaneous delivery of the plague bacterium by numerous (3-10) flea bites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 13 22%
Other 10 17%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 15%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,497,566
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#60
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,672
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them