↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for fungal and chemodenitrification based N2O flux from nitrogen impacted coastal sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for fungal and chemodenitrification based N2O flux from nitrogen impacted coastal sediments
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott D. Wankel, Wiebke Ziebis, Carolyn Buchwald, Chawalit Charoenpong, Dirk de Beer, Jane Dentinger, Zhenjiang Xu, Karsten Zengler

Abstract

Although increasing atmospheric nitrous oxide (N2O) has been linked to nitrogen loading, predicting emissions remains difficult, in part due to challenges in disentangling diverse N2O production pathways. As coastal ecosystems are especially impacted by elevated nitrogen, we investigated controls on N2O production mechanisms in intertidal sediments using novel isotopic approaches and microsensors in flow-through incubations. Here we show that during incubations with elevated nitrate, increased N2O fluxes are not mediated by direct bacterial activity, but instead are largely catalysed by fungal denitrification and/or abiotic reactions (e.g., chemodenitrification). Results of these incubations shed new light on nitrogen cycling complexity and possible factors underlying variability of N2O fluxes, driven in part by fungal respiration and/or iron redox cycling. As both processes exhibit N2O yields typically far greater than direct bacterial production, these results emphasize their possibly substantial, yet widely overlooked, role in N2O fluxes, especially in redox-dynamic sediments of coastal ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 45 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 44 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,602,183
of 24,246,771 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,927
of 51,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,815
of 320,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#540
of 1,103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,246,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.