↓ Skip to main content

A Critique of FAWC’s Five Freedoms as a Framework for the Analysis of Animal Welfare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
A Critique of FAWC’s Five Freedoms as a Framework for the Analysis of Animal Welfare
Published in
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7
Authors

Steven P. McCulloch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 331 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 20%
Student > Master 62 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 12%
Other 18 5%
Researcher 17 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 81 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 76 23%
Psychology 13 4%
Environmental Science 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 90 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,573,861
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#64
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,989
of 279,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them