↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis comparing the sensitivity of bees to pesticides

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta-analysis comparing the sensitivity of bees to pesticides
Published in
Ecotoxicology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1190-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Arena, Fabio Sgolastra

Abstract

The honey bee Apis mellifera, the test species used in the current environmental risk assessment procedure, is generally considered as extremely sensitive to pesticides when compared to other bee species, although a quantitative approach for comparing the difference in sensitivity among bees has not yet been reported. A systematic review of the relevant literature on the topic followed by a meta-analysis has been performed. Both the contact and oral acute LD50 and the chronic LC50 reported in laboratory studies for as many substances as possible have been extracted from the papers in order to compare the sensitivity to pesticides of honey bees and other bee species (Apiformes). The sensitivity ratio R between the endpoint for the species a (A. mellifera) and the species s (bees other than A. mellifera) was calculated for a total of 150 case studies including 19 bee species. A ratio higher than 1 indicated that the species s was more sensitive to pesticides than honey bees. The meta-analysis showed a high variability of sensitivity among bee species (R from 0.001 to 2085.7), however, in approximately 95 % of the cases the sensitivity ratio was below 10. The effect of pesticides in domestic and wild bees is dependent on the intrinsic sensitivity of single bee species as well as their specific life cycle, nesting activity and foraging behaviour. Current data indicates a need for more comparative information between honey bees and non-Apis bees as well as separate pesticide risk assessment procedures for non-Apis bees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 16%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Master 53 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 83 18%
Unknown 88 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 208 46%
Environmental Science 49 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Unspecified 13 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 112 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,808,484
of 24,394,175 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#76
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,743
of 314,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.