| Title |
The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-009-2236-0 |
| Authors |
Erik Von Elm, Simon Wandel, Peter Jüni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Professor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Librarian | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,521,959
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#979
of 2,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,580
of 93,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.