↓ Skip to main content

Shifting public values and what they mean for increasing democracy in wildlife management decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
72 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Shifting public values and what they mean for increasing democracy in wildlife management decisions
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1378-9
Authors

Lily M. van Eeden, Chris R. Dickman, Euan G. Ritchie, Thomas M. Newsome

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Environmental Science 27 23%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#525,254
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#55
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,014
of 323,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.