| Title |
Episodic ataxia type 2: phenotype characteristics of a novel CACNA1A mutation and review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-014-7310-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Nachbauer, Michael Nocker, Elfriede Karner, Iva Stankovic, Iris Unterberger, Andreas Eigentler, Rainer Schneider, Werner Poewe, Margarete Delazer, Sylvia Boesch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,531,132
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,811
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,275
of 224,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.