↓ Skip to main content

Observation-Based Estimates of Global Glacier Mass Change and Its Contribution to Sea-Level Change

Overview of attention for article published in Surveys in Geophysics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 286)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Observation-Based Estimates of Global Glacier Mass Change and Its Contribution to Sea-Level Change
Published in
Surveys in Geophysics, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10712-016-9394-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Marzeion, N. Champollion, W. Haeberli, K. Langley, P. Leclercq, F. Paul

Abstract

Glaciers have strongly contributed to sea-level rise during the past century and will continue to be an important part of the sea-level budget during the twenty-first century. Here, we review the progress in estimating global glacier mass change from in situ measurements of mass and length changes, remote sensing methods, and mass balance modeling driven by climate observations. For the period before the onset of satellite observations, different strategies to overcome the uncertainty associated with monitoring only a small sample of the world's glaciers have been developed. These methods now yield estimates generally reconcilable with each other within their respective uncertainty margins. Whereas this is also the case for the recent decades, the greatly increased number of estimates obtained from remote sensing reveals that gravimetry-based methods typically arrive at lower mass loss estimates than the other methods. We suggest that strategies for better interconnecting the different methods are needed to ensure progress and to increase the temporal and spatial detail of reliable glacier mass change estimates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 119 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 64 52%
Environmental Science 16 13%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,145,794
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#34
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,331
of 311,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.