↓ Skip to main content

Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: A tutorial review

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: A tutorial review
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, June 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13414-017-1338-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hauke S. Meyerhoff, Frank Papenmeier, Markus Huff

Abstract

Human observers are capable of tracking multiple objects among identical distractors based only on their spatiotemporal information. Since the first report of this ability in the seminal work of Pylyshyn and Storm (1988, Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197), multiple object tracking has attracted many researchers. A reason for this is that it is commonly argued that the attentional processes studied with the multiple object paradigm apparently match the attentional processing during real-world tasks such as driving or team sports. We argue that multiple object tracking provides a good mean to study the broader topic of continuous and dynamic visual attention. Indeed, several (partially contradicting) theories of attentive tracking have been proposed within the almost 30 years since its first report, and a large body of research has been conducted to test these theories. With regard to the richness and diversity of this literature, the aim of this tutorial review is to provide researchers who are new in the field of multiple object tracking with an overview over the multiple object tracking paradigm, its basic manipulations, as well as links to other paradigms investigating visual attention and working memory. Further, we aim at reviewing current theories of tracking as well as their empirical evidence. Finally, we review the state of the art in the most prominent research fields of multiple object tracking and how this research has helped to understand visual attention in dynamic settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 62 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 32%
Neuroscience 21 9%
Computer Science 11 5%
Engineering 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 73 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#13,740,062
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#511
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,027
of 320,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.