↓ Skip to main content

Grey parrot numerical competence: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Grey parrot numerical competence: a review
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene M. Pepperberg

Abstract

The extent to which humans and nonhumans share numerical competency is a matter of debate. Some researchers argue that nonhumans, lacking human language, possess only a simple understanding of small quantities, generally less than four. Animals that have, however, received some training in human communication systems might demonstrate abilities intermediate between those of untrained nonhumans and humans. Here I review data for a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) that has been shown to quantify sets of up to and including six items (including heterogeneous subsets) using vocal English labels, to comprehend these labels fully, and to have a zero-like concept. Recent research demonstrates that he can also sum small quantities. His success shows that he understands number symbols as abstract representations of real-world collections, and that his sense of number compares favorably to that of chimpanzees and young human children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 38%
Psychology 28 20%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#333,883
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#97
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#404
of 66,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.