| Title |
The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-017-9486-x |
| Authors |
Charlie Huveneers, Mark G. Meekan, Kirin Apps, Luciana C. Ferreira, David Pannell, Gabriel M. S. Vianna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 23% |
| Australia | 11 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| Bahamas | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 70% |
| Scientists | 21 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#254,770
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#5
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,366
of 332,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.