Title |
Novel Hollow Microneedle Technology for Depth-Controlled Microinjection-Mediated Dermal Vaccination: A Study with Polio Vaccine in Rats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11095-013-1288-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Koen van der Maaden, Sebastiaan J. Trietsch, Heleen Kraan, Eleni Maria Varypataki, Stefan Romeijn, Raphäel Zwier, Heiko J. van der Linden, Gideon Kersten, Thomas Hankemeier, Wim Jiskoot, Joke Bouwstra |
Abstract |
The aim of the study was to develop a cheap and fast method to produce hollow microneedles and an applicator for injecting vaccines into the skin at a pre-defined depth and test the applicability of the system for dermal polio vaccination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 19% |
Engineering | 14 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,361,534
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,472
of 2,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,903
of 307,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.