↓ Skip to main content

Informing Environmental Water Management Decisions: Using Conditional Probability Networks to Address the Information Needs of Planning and Implementation Cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Informing Environmental Water Management Decisions: Using Conditional Probability Networks to Address the Information Needs of Planning and Implementation Cycles
Published in
Environmental Management, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0874-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avril C. Horne, Joanna M. Szemis, J. Angus Webb, Simranjit Kaur, Michael J. Stewardson, Nick Bond, Rory Nathan

Abstract

One important aspect of adaptive management is the clear and transparent documentation of hypotheses, together with the use of predictive models (complete with any assumptions) to test those hypotheses. Documentation of such models can improve the ability to learn from management decisions and supports dialog between stakeholders. A key challenge is how best to represent the existing scientific knowledge to support decision-making. Such challenges are currently emerging in the field of environmental water management in Australia, where managers are required to prioritize the delivery of environmental water on an annual basis, using a transparent and evidence-based decision framework. We argue that the development of models of ecological responses to environmental water use needs to support both the planning and implementation cycles of adaptive management. Here we demonstrate an approach based on the use of Conditional Probability Networks to translate existing ecological knowledge into quantitative models that include temporal dynamics to support adaptive environmental flow management. It equally extends to other applications where knowledge is incomplete, but decisions must still be made.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 29%
Engineering 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 37%