↓ Skip to main content

Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan T. deBettencourt, Kenneth A. Norman, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne

Abstract

When performing any task for an extended period of time, attention fluctuates between good and bad states. These fluctuations affect performance in the moment, but may also have lasting consequences for what gets encoded into memory. Experiment 1 establishes this relationship between attentional states and memory, by showing that subsequent memory for an item was predicted by a response time index of sustained attention (average response time during the three trials prior to stimulus onset). Experiment 2 strengthens the causal interpretation of this predictive relationship by treating the sustained attention index as an independent variable to trigger the appearance of an encoding trial. Subsequent memory was better when items were triggered from good versus bad attentional states. Together, these findings suggest that sustained attention can have downstream consequences for what we remember, and they highlight the inferential utility of adaptive experimental designs. By continuously monitoring attention, we can influence what will later be remembered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 45%
Neuroscience 26 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 32 22%