↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative assessment on blood–brain barrier permeability of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia: a CT perfusion study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative assessment on blood–brain barrier permeability of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia: a CT perfusion study
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00234-017-1852-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haoli Xu, Rui Li, Yuxia Duan, Jincheng Wang, Shuailiang Liu, Yue Zhang, Wenwen He, Xiaotao Qin, Guoquan Cao, Yunjun Yang, Qichuan Zhuge, Jun Yang, Weijian Chen

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage aggravates perihematomal edema, and edema volume predicts prognosis independently. But the BBB permeability at the late stage of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients is uncertain. We aimed to assess the BBB permeability of spontaneous basal ganglia ICH using computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) and investigates its relationship with hematoma and perihematomal edema volume. We performed CTP on 54 consecutive ICH patients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Permeability-surface area product (PS) derived from CTP imaging was measured in hematoma, "high-PS spot," perihematoma, normal-appearing, hemispheric, and contralateral regions. Hematoma and edema volumes were calculated from non-contrast CT. "High-PS spot" and perihematoma regions had higher PS than the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Hematoma PS was lower than that in the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS of the large-hematoma group was higher than that of the small-hematoma group (p = 0.011). Perihematomal edema volume correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.864, p < 0.001) and perihematoma PS (β = 0.478, p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.373, p = 0.005). Locally elevated perihematoma PS was found in most spontaneous basal ganglia ICH patients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Perihematoma PS was higher in larger hematomas and was associated with larger edema volume. At this period, BBB leakage is likely to be an important factor in edema formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Neuroscience 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,464,404
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#757
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,425
of 317,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.