↓ Skip to main content

From measures of effects to measures of potential impact

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
From measures of effects to measures of potential impact
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00038-008-8025-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Perez, Nino Künzli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Environmental Science 8 19%
Engineering 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#878
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,406
of 184,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.