You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised controlled trial of a consumer-focused e-health strategy for cardiovascular risk management in primary care: the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Redfern, T Usherwood, M F Harris, A Rodgers, N Hayman, K Panaretto, C Chow, A Y S Lau, L Neubeck, G Coorey, F Hersch, E Heeley, A Patel, S Jan, N Zwar, D Peiris |
| Abstract |
Fewer than half of all people at highest risk of a cardiovascular event are receiving and adhering to best practice recommendations to lower their risk. In this project, we examine the role of an e-health-assisted consumer-focused strategy as a means of overcoming these gaps between evidence and practice. Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) aims to test whether a consumer-focused e-health strategy provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-indigenous adults, recruited through primary care, at moderate-to-high risk of a cardiovascular disease event will improve risk factor control when compared with usual care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 347 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Researcher | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 14% |
| Psychology | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,575,388
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,028
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,269
of 322,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#54
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.