↓ Skip to main content

Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis and monitoring of idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis and monitoring of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Published in
Journal of Neurology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00415-017-8532-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Albrecht, Christine Blasberg, Marius Ringelstein, Ann-Kristin Müller, David Finis, Rainer Guthoff, Ella-Maria Kadas, Wolf Lagreze, Orhan Aktas, Hans-Peter Hartung, Friedemann Paul, Alexander U. Brandt, Axel Methner

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to investigate the value of optical coherence tomography in detecting papilledema in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), a disease which is difficult to monitor and which can lead to permanent visual deficits; to analyze retinal changes over time. In this non-interventional case-control study, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was used to analyze the retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) morphology of 21 patients with IIH and 27 age- and sex-matched healthy controls over time. We analyzed the ONH volume using a custom-made algorithm and employed semi-automated segmentation of macular volume scans to assess the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer complex as well as the total macular volume. In IIH patients, the ONH volume was increased and correlated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. The ONH volume decreased after the initiation of treatment with acetazolamide. The macular RNFL volume decreased by 5% in 3.5 months, and a stepwise multivariate regression analysis identified CSF pressure as the main influence on macular RNFL volume at diagnosis. The only factor predicting macular RNFL volume loss over time was ONH volume. SD-OCT can non-invasively monitor changes in retinal and ONH morphology in patients with IIH. Increased ONH volume leads to retinal atrophy in the form of macular RNFL volume loss, presumably due to mechanic jamming of the optic nerve at the disc and subsequent axonal loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 50%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,350,775
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,033
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,071
of 317,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#28
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.