| Title |
Looking to the past and the future: were the Madeira River rapids a geographical barrier to the boto (Cetacea: Iniidae)?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-014-0565-4 |
| Authors |
Waleska Gravena, Izeni P. Farias, Maria N. F. da Silva, Vera M. F. da Silva, Tomas Hrbek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#465
of 1,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,245
of 325,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.