Title |
Influence of the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon on energy cost and running mechanics
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2824-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gianluca Vernillo, Aldo Savoldelli, Andrea Zignoli, Pietro Trabucchi, Barbara Pellegrini, Grégoire P. Millet, Federico Schena |
Abstract |
To examine the effects of the world's most challenging mountain ultra-marathon (Tor des Géants(®) 2012) on the energy cost of three types of locomotion (cycling, level and uphill running) and running kinematics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 48 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,138,453
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#703
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,260
of 322,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.