↓ Skip to main content

The Clinical Impact of Additional Late PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Clinical Impact of Additional Late PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.183483
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is routinely performed at 1h post injection (p.i.), later scans may be beneficial since most lesions present with higher uptake and contrast. This evaluation aimed to investigate the clinical impact of additional late (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT. Between 2011 and 2016, 112 patients with PCa who received early (at 1h p.i.) and late (at 3h p.i.) (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT scans were retrospectively evaluated. The late scans were conducted in order to clarify unclear findings in early scans or to increase the probability of tumor detection in case of negative early scans. All patients were asked to drink 1 liter of water between early and late scans. In addition, 20 of them received 20 milligram furosemide prior to late scans. Tumor detection and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder were analyzed in both scans. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and contrast of 149 tumor lesions were measured in 69 patients with pathological findings. Overall, 134 lesions characteristic for PCa in 57 patients clearly presented at 1h p.i. and 147 lesions in 68 patients at 3h p.i.. Forty-three patients showed no pathological findings. Eight patients (7.1%) showed one unclear finding in early scans which could be clarified as characteristic for PCa at 3h p.i.. Four patients (3.6%) presented with one lesion characteristic for PCa at 3h p.i. only. Twelve patients (10.7%) presented with 12 possible PCa lesions at 1h p.i., which, however, could not be confirmed as PCa in late scans. Two patients presented with one lesion characteristic for PCa at 1h p.i. which became invisible at 3h p.i. due to low contrast. At 3h p.i., 62.4% of the lesions demonstrated higher SUVmax and 65.1% higher contrast compared to 1h p.i. Patients with furosemide presented with lower SUV and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder. (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT at 3h p.i. showed most lesions characteristic for PCa with higher uptake and contrast. In addition, the radioactivity signal within the urinary bladder was lower at 3h p.i., especially when furosemide was applied. Consequently, scans at 3h p.i. detected more tumor lesions than 1h p.i.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 27 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#7,469,525
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#2,675
of 8,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,943
of 463,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.