↓ Skip to main content

Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3433-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Kang, Mahdi Azizian, Emmanuel Wilson, Kyle Wu, Aaron D. Martin, Timothy D. Kane, Craig A. Peters, Kevin Cleary, Raj Shekhar

Abstract

Conventional laparoscopes provide a flat representation of the three-dimensional (3D) operating field and are incapable of visualizing internal structures located beneath visible organ surfaces. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images are difficult to fuse in real time with laparoscopic views due to the deformable nature of soft-tissue organs. Utilizing emerging camera technology, we have developed a real-time stereoscopic augmented-reality (AR) system for laparoscopic surgery by merging live laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) with stereoscopic video. The system creates two new visual cues: (1) perception of true depth with improved understanding of 3D spatial relationships among anatomical structures, and (2) visualization of critical internal structures along with a more comprehensive visualization of the operating field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 23%
Computer Science 39 22%
Engineering 33 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,970,998
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#368
of 6,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,387
of 310,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#6
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.