↓ Skip to main content

Vocal Patterns in Infants with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Canonical Babbling Status and Vocalization Frequency

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Vocal Patterns in Infants with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Canonical Babbling Status and Vocalization Frequency
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2047-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Patten, Katie Belardi, Grace T. Baranek, Linda R. Watson, Jeffrey D. Labban, D. Kimbrough Oller

Abstract

Canonical babbling is a critical milestone for speech development and is usually well in place by 10 months. The possibility that infants with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show late onset of canonical babbling has so far eluded evaluation. Rate of vocalization or "volubility" has also been suggested as possibly aberrant in infants with ASD. We conducted a retrospective video study examining vocalizations of 37 infants at 9-12 and 15-18 months. Twenty-three of the 37 infants were later diagnosed with ASD and indeed produced low rates of canonical babbling and low volubility by comparison with the 14 typically developing infants. The study thus supports suggestions that very early vocal patterns may prove to be a useful component of early screening and diagnosis of ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 251 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 24%
Linguistics 31 12%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 66 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,453,480
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,047
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,610
of 323,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.