| Title |
Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta- analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Barry, Rose Galvin, Claire Keogh, Frances Horgan, Tom Fahey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,693 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1681 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 320 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 273 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 112 | 7% |
| Researcher | 106 | 6% |
| Other | 231 | 14% |
| Unknown | 510 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 370 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 351 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 122 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 58 | 3% |
| Engineering | 47 | 3% |
| Other | 161 | 10% |
| Unknown | 584 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#707,468
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#86
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,307
of 325,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.