↓ Skip to main content

Strongest Families™ Managing Our Mood (MOM): a randomized controlled trial of a distance intervention for women with postpartum depression

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Strongest Families™ Managing Our Mood (MOM): a randomized controlled trial of a distance intervention for women with postpartum depression
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00737-017-0732-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori Wozney, Janine Olthuis, Patricia Lingley-Pottie, Patrick J. McGrath, William Chaplin, Frank Elgar, Brianna Cheney, Anna Huguet, Karen Turner, Jillian Kennedy

Abstract

The present study investigated whether a distance-delivered intervention could significantly decrease mild to moderate postpartum depression (PPD) in mothers as compared to usual care. Mothers with PPD (n = 62) were randomly assigned to the intervention or standard community care. Participants receiving the intervention followed a 12-session cognitive behavioural informed handbook supplemented with telephone-based coaching support. Diagnostic status and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months postrandomization. Odds ratios indicated that intervention group participants were 1.5 times as likely to experience diagnostic remission at 3 months (mid-intervention) (p = 0.742), 1.54 times as likely at 6 months (p = 0.696) and 12.5 times as likely at 12 months (p = 0.009). Intervention 'dosage' significantly moderated this effect; for every additional coaching session completed, individuals had a 1.4 times greater chance of showing improvement at 3 and 6 months. Mothers reported high satisfaction with the intervention. Findings suggest positive outcomes at each time point and superior outcomes to the control condition at the long-term follow-up. Caution in interpreting these results is warranted due to small sample size and incomplete data; however, they support further investigation into the use of distance interventions as an accessible and effective solution for women with PPD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 74 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,671,701
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#469
of 941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,533
of 318,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.