↓ Skip to main content

Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Intentionality

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Intentionality
Published in
Minds and Machines, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11023-017-9437-2
Authors

Alex Morgan, Gualtiero Piccinini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 17 41%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Psychology 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,363,471
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#239
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,317
of 331,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.