| Title |
The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nehmat Houssami, Petra Macaskill, M. Luke Marinovich, Monica Morrow |
| Abstract |
There is no consensus on what constitutes adequate negative margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We systematically review the evidence on surgical margins in BCT for invasive breast cancer to support the development of clinical guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 83 | 26% |
| Unknown | 65 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 169 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#771,466
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#66
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,088
of 327,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.