↓ Skip to main content

The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 11,008)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
772 Mendeley
Title
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas James Wood, Dave Goulson

Abstract

Neonicotinoid pesticides were first introduced in the mid-1990s, and since then, their use has grown rapidly. They are now the most widely used class of insecticides in the world, with the majority of applications coming from seed dressings. Neonicotinoids are water-soluble, and so can be taken up by a developing plant and can be found inside vascular tissues and foliage, providing protection against herbivorous insects. However, only approximately 5% of the neonicotinoid active ingredient is taken up by crop plants and most instead disperses into the wider environment. Since the mid-2000s, several studies raised concerns that neonicotinoids may be having a negative effect on non-target organisms, in particular on honeybees and bumblebees. In response to these studies, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was commissioned to produce risk assessments for the use of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and their impact on bees. These risk assessments concluded that the use of these compounds on certain flowering crops poses a high risk to bees. On the basis of these findings, the European Union adopted a partial ban on these substances in May 2013. The purpose of the present paper is to collate and summarise scientific evidence published since 2013 that investigates the impact of neonicotinoids on non-target organisms. Whilst much of the recent work has focused on the impact of neonicotinoids on bees, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that persistent, low levels of neonicotinoids can have negative impacts on a wide range of free-living organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 772 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 771 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 15%
Student > Master 119 15%
Student > Bachelor 116 15%
Researcher 76 10%
Other 32 4%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 195 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 230 30%
Environmental Science 117 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 5%
Chemistry 35 5%
Engineering 19 2%
Other 95 12%
Unknown 236 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 608. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#37,880
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#4
of 11,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 332,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.