↓ Skip to main content

PEEK rod systems for the spine

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 873)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
PEEK rod systems for the spine
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1421-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Christos Vottis, George Triantafyllopoulos, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos, Spyros G. Pneumaticos

Abstract

Traditional materials for the spine such as titanium and stainless steel have produced satisfying long-term fusion rates, mainly due to their strength and stiffness. However, although fixation with titanium rods leads to high fusion rates, increased stiffness of titanium constructs may also contribute to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. Dynamic and flexible materials such as the Dynesys system allow better stress distribution to all of the spinal columns, but increase the rate of complications including screw loosening, infection, back and leg pain, and endplate vertebral fracture. Semi-rigid instrumentation systems using rods made from synthetic polymers such as the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) have been recently introduced as an alternative biomaterial for the spine. PEEK is a fully biocompatible and inert semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer with minimal toxicity; it has a modulus of elasticity between that of cortical and cancellous bone, and significantly lower than titanium. However, there are very few clinical studies with small sample size and short-term follow-up using PEEK rod-pedicle screw spinal instrumentation systems. Additionally, their results are conflicting. To enhance the literature, this review discusses the effect of this medical for the spine and summarizes the results of the most important related series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Engineering 11 19%
Materials Science 4 7%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,186,629
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#36
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,101
of 307,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.