↓ Skip to main content

The On-Line Processing of Verb-Phrase Ellipsis in Aphasia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The On-Line Processing of Verb-Phrase Ellipsis in Aphasia
Published in
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10936-009-9108-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josée Poirier, Lewis P. Shapiro, Tracy Love, Yosef Grodzinsky

Abstract

We investigate the on-line processing of verb-phrase ellipsis (VPE) constructions in two brain injured populations: Broca's and Anomic aphasics. VPE constructions are built from two simple clauses; the first is the antecedent clause and the second is the ellipsis clause. The ellipsis clause is missing its verb and object (i.e., its verb phrase (VP)), which receives its reference from the fully specified VP in the antecedent clause. VPE constructions are unlike other sentence types that require displacement of an argument NP; these latter constructions (e.g., object-relatives, wh-questions) yield either on-time or delayed antecedent reactivation. Our results demonstrate that Anomics, like unimpaired individuals, evince reactivation of the direct object NP (within the VP) at the elided position. Broca's patients, on the other hand, do not show reactivation of the antecedent. We consider several interpretations for our data, including explanations focusing on the larger 'grain size' of the reconstructed material in the ellipsis clause, the properties of the auxiliary that carries tense and agreement features, and the possibility that the cost-free syntactic copy procedure claimed to underlie VPE may be modulated by the functional deficit in Broca's aphasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
China 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 25%
Linguistics 8 20%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 13%