↓ Skip to main content

Seeing Jesus in toast: Neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia

Overview of attention for article published in Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,081)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seeing Jesus in toast: Neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia
Published in
Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiangang Liu, Jun Li, Lu Feng, Ling Li, Jie Tian, Kang Lee

Abstract

Face pareidolia is the illusory perception of non-existent faces. The present study, for the first time, contrasted behavioral and neural responses of face pareidolia with those of letter pareidolia to explore face-specific behavioral and neural responses during illusory face processing. Participants were shown pure-noise images but were led to believe that 50% of them contained either faces or letters; they reported seeing faces or letters illusorily 34% and 38% of the time, respectively. The right fusiform face area (rFFA) showed a specific response when participants "saw" faces as opposed to letters in the pure-noise images. Behavioral responses during face pareidolia produced a classification image (CI) that resembled a face, whereas those during letter pareidolia produced a CI that was letter-like. Further, the extent to which such behavioral CIs resembled faces was directly related to the level of face-specific activations in the rFFA. This finding suggests that the rFFA plays a specific role not only in processing of real faces but also in illusory face perception, perhaps serving to facilitate the interaction between bottom-up information from the primary visual cortex and top-down signals from the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Whole brain analyses revealed a network specialized in face pareidolia, including both the frontal and occipitotemporal regions. Our findings suggest that human face processing has a strong top-down component whereby sensory input with even the slightest suggestion of a face can result in the interpretation of a face.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 364 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Researcher 56 15%
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Other 23 6%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 64 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 139 36%
Neuroscience 38 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 4%
Computer Science 14 4%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 81 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 978. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,022
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#4
of 3,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96
of 324,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.