↓ Skip to main content

Olfaction as a cue for product quality

Overview of attention for article published in Marketing Letters, July 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Olfaction as a cue for product quality
Published in
Marketing Letters, July 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00994136
Authors

Paula Fitzgerald Bone, Swati Jantrania

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 42 40%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Marketing Letters
#193
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,448
of 18,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marketing Letters
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.