| Title |
An Inexpensive Method for Applying Nitrogen Evaporation to Hexane-containing 24- or 96-well Plates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10616-005-5876-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carrie P. Nevins, Janet L. Vierck, Lindsey D. Bogachus, Nicole S. Velotta, Federico Castro-Munozledo, Michael V. Dodson |
| Abstract |
A method is described for assembling an evaporation manifold from a cell culture flask, which allows for efficient nitrogen evaporation of hexane from 24- and 96-well plates. The precursor parts are readily available in most research laboratories. The nitrogen evaporation manifold is inexpensive, could possibly be used with other organic solvents, and appears ideal for a small number of samples in a multi-well format. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 30% |
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#336
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,738
of 69,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.