↓ Skip to main content

Dog rabies data reported to multinational organizations from Southern and Eastern African countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Dog rabies data reported to multinational organizations from Southern and Eastern African countries
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2527-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariku Jibat Beyene, Monique C. M. Mourits, Henk Hogeveen

Abstract

Rabies is one of the viral diseases with the highest case fatality rate in humans. The main transmission route to humans is through bites, especially of infected dogs. Decisions on the allocation of resources to control and reduce the socio-economic impacts of rabies require reliable data. Several national, regional and international organizations have been gathering rabies data for more than a decade. The objective of this paper was to examine the consistencies in the number of dog rabies cases reported to different multinational organizations by Southern and Eastern African countries and to explore the presence of any time trend among the reported rabies data. Data was systematically extracted from the databases of the Southern and Eastern African Rabies Group-SEARG and the World Organization for Animal Health/World animal health information-OIE/WAHID. Despite differences in entities by which data have been reported to the two organisations, reported numbers were significantly correlated (Spearman's rho = 0.52, P < 0.001). The reported data did not indicate the presence of any trend in the number of reported dog rabies outbreaks. Inconsistencies in the reported numbers were observed between the databases, possibly due to the fact that human and animal health authorities report separately to the organisations involved in addition to the use of indefinite definitions of report categories set by report receiving organizations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 27%
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,067,995
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,872
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,656
of 317,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#29
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.