Title |
How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1 |
Authors |
Kuan-Hui Elaine Lin, Hsiang-Chieh Lee, Thung-Hong Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 19 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 19% |
Engineering | 12 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#12,847,953
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,136
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,266
of 313,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.