↓ Skip to main content

How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability
Published in
Natural Hazards, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1
Authors

Kuan-Hui Elaine Lin, Hsiang-Chieh Lee, Thung-Hong Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 20%
Social Sciences 18 19%
Engineering 12 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#12,847,953
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,136
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,266
of 313,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.