| Title |
Performance of an Artificial Multi-observer Deep Neural Network for Fully Automated Segmentation of Polycystic Kidneys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-017-9978-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy L. Kline, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Marie E. Edwards, Jaime D. Blais, Frank S. Czerwiec, Peter C. Harris, Bernard F. King, Vicente E. Torres, Bradley J. Erickson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 28% |
| Engineering | 10 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,351,161
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#348
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,353
of 327,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.