↓ Skip to main content

Are there altered antibody responses to measles, mumps, or rubella viruses in autism?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,018)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
20 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Are there altered antibody responses to measles, mumps, or rubella viruses in autism?
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2007
DOI 10.1080/13550280701278462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane E. Libbey, Hilary H. Coon, Nikki J. Kirkman, Thayne L. Sweeten, Judith N. Miller, Janet E. Lainhart, William M. McMahon, Robert S. Fujinami

Abstract

The role that virus infections play in autism is not known. Others have reported that antibodies against measles virus are higher in the sera/plasma of children with autism versus controls. The authors investigated antibody titers to measles, mumps, and rubella viruses and diphtheria toxoid in children with autism, both classic onset (33) and regressive onset (26) forms, controls (25, healthy age- and gender-matched) and individuals with Tourette's syndrome (24) via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. No significant differences in antibody titers to measles, mumps, and rubella viruses and diphtheria toxoid were found among the four groups. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the four groups for total immunoglobulin (Ig)G or IgM. Interestingly, the authors did find a significant number (15/59) of autism subjects (classic and regressive onset combined) who had a very low or no antibody titer against rubella virus, compared to a combine control/Tourette's group (2/49).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Lecturer 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Psychology 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,100,262
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#18
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,964
of 86,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them