↓ Skip to main content

Associations between DSM-IV mental disorders and diabetes mellitus: a role for impulse control disorders and depression

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Associations between DSM-IV mental disorders and diabetes mellitus: a role for impulse control disorders and depression
Published in
Diabetologia, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-3157-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter de Jonge, Jordi Alonso, Dan J. Stein, Andrzej Kiejna, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Maria Carmen Viana, Zhaorui Liu, Siobhan O’Neill, Ronny Bruffaerts, Jose Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Jean-Pierre Lepine, Herbert Matschinger, Daphna Levinson, Giovanni de Girolamo, Akira Fukao, Brendan Bunting, Josep Maria Haro, Jose A. Posada-Villa, Ali Obaid Al-Hamzawi, Maria Elena Medina-Mora, Marina Piazza, Chiyi Hu, Carmen Sasu, Carmen C. W. Lim, Ronald C. Kessler, Kate M. Scott

Abstract

No studies have evaluated whether the frequently observed associations between depression and diabetes could reflect the presence of comorbid psychiatric conditions and their associations with diabetes. We therefore examined the associations between a wide range of pre-existing Diagnostic Statistical Manual, 4th edition (DSM-IV) mental disorders with self-reported diagnosis of diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Professor 14 7%
Other 48 25%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 22%
Psychology 32 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 61 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#345,447
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#195
of 5,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,270
of 322,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.