↓ Skip to main content

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Geometric inequalities for black holes
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10714-014-1715-1
Authors

Sergio Dain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 13%
Korea, Republic of 1 13%
Brazil 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor 2 25%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 88%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#700
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,970
of 230,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.