↓ Skip to main content

Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: stroke risk stratification and anticoagulation

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: stroke risk stratification and anticoagulation
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10741-014-9420-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

JoEllyn M. Abraham, Stuart J. Connolly

Abstract

For an individual patient with both atrial fibrillation and heart failure, stroke risk is one of the most prominent mitigating factors for subsequent morbidity and mortality. Although the CHADS₂ stroke risk score is the most widely used score for risk stratification, it does not take into account the risk factors of vascular disease, female gender, or the age group 65-74 years, for which there is increasing evidence. There is also evidence that diastolic heart failure is as much a risk factor for stroke as systolic heart failure. The new oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban appear to be appropriate agents in the heart failure population with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke although there are dose-adjustments for renal insufficiency and these medications are contraindicated in advanced renal disease. As with the atrial fibrillation population as a whole, bleeding risk should be considered for every patient with heart failure prior to making recommendations regarding anticoagulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#547
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,471
of 305,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.