↓ Skip to main content

The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk

Overview of attention for article published in npj Breast Cancer, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
Published in
npj Breast Cancer, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas P. Slavin, Kara N. Maxwell, Jenna Lilyquist, Joseph Vijai, Susan L. Neuhausen, Steven N. Hart, Vignesh Ravichandran, Tinu Thomas, Ann Maria, Danylo Villano, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Raymond Moore, Chunling Hu, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Brandon M. Wenz, Kurt D’Andrea, Mark E. Robson, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, James M. Ford, Judy E. Garber, Susan M. Domchek, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch

Abstract

Understanding the gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved clinical care for those carrying germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. We sought to detail the spectrum of mutations and refine risk estimates for known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Targeted massively-parallel sequencing was performed to identify mutations and copy number variants in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA1/2-negative women with familial breast cancer (proband with breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer) from a largely European-Caucasian multi-institutional cohort. Case-control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in familial breast cancer women to Exome Aggregation Consortium controls. Mutations were identified in 8.2% of familial breast cancer women, including mutations in high-risk (odds ratio > 5) (1.4%) and moderate-risk genes (2 < odds ratio < 5) (2.9%). The remaining familial breast cancer women had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.7%), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5%), and six cases had two mutations (0.3%). Case-control analysis demonstrated associations with familial breast cancer for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (odds ratio > 3.0, p < 10(-4)), BARD1 mutations (odds ratio = 3.2, p = 0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (odds ratio = 1.6, p = 0.041). Our results demonstrate that approximately 4.7% of BRCA1/2 negative familial breast cancer women have mutations in genes statistically associated with breast cancer. We classified PALB2 and TP53 as high-risk, ATM and BARD1 as moderate risk, and CHEK2 truncating mutations as low risk breast cancer predisposition genes. This study demonstrates that large case-control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with mutations in moderate-risk and proposed susceptibility genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,344,052
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from npj Breast Cancer
#279
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,892
of 317,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Breast Cancer
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.