You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cold Hyperalgesia Associated With Poorer Prognosis in Lateral Epicondylalgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical journal of pain, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brooke K Coombes, Leanne Bisset, Bill Vicenzino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,338,984
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#563
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,494
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.