↓ Skip to main content

Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10877-017-0032-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cronhjort, Olof Wall, Erik Nyberg, Ruifeng Zeng, Christer Svensen, Johan Mårtensson, Eva Joelsson-Alm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 34 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 39 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#251
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,277
of 335,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.