↓ Skip to main content

Urinary mulberry cells and mulberry bodies are useful tool to detect late-onset Fabry disease

Overview of attention for article published in CEN Case Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Urinary mulberry cells and mulberry bodies are useful tool to detect late-onset Fabry disease
Published in
CEN Case Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13730-017-0262-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Homare Shimohata, Hiroshi Maruyama, Yasunori Miyamoto, Mamiko Takayasu, Kouichi Hirayama, Masaki Kobayashi

Abstract

Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by a lack of α-galactosidase A activity, which leads to the accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in various organs. A complete lack of α-galactosidase A activity in a hemizygous male is the classical phenotype, and some hemizygous males show primarily cardiac and/or renal symptoms that appear in adulthood; this is called the variant type or the late-onset type. The kidney and heart are the major target organs, with damage to these organs related to mortality. Thus, in Fabry patients, early detection and early treatment are critical to longevity. Here, we present a 55-year-old Japanese male patient who was diagnosed with late-onset Fabry nephropathy with cardiomyopathy but with no abnormal urinary findings except for urinary mulberry cells and mulberry bodies. In spite of the absence of abnormal urinary findings, the light microscopic and electron microscopic pathological findings showed extensive deposition of globotriaosylceramide to podocytes. In this paper, we propose that the presence of mulberry cells and mulberry bodies can be used for the earlier detection of Fabry nephropathy, especially the late-onset type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 26%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,427,593
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from CEN Case Reports
#176
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,078
of 317,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CEN Case Reports
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.