↓ Skip to main content

Depressive burden is associated with a poorer surgical outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a 5-year follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depressive burden is associated with a poorer surgical outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a 5-year follow-up study
Published in
Spine Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarit Pakarinen, Susanna Vanhanen, Sanna Sinikallio, Timo Aalto, Soili M. Lehto, Olavi Airaksinen, Heimo Viinamäki

Abstract

In lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), conservative treatment is usually the first choice of treatment. If conservative treatment fails, surgery is indicated. Psychological factors such as depression and anxiety are known to affect the outcome of surgery. Previous studies on depression and surgery outcome using long follow-up times are scarce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 33%
Unspecified 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,973,682
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#205
of 3,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,276
of 322,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#10
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.