↓ Skip to main content

Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13068-017-0834-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Supriya Mathur, A. V. Umakanth, V. A. Tonapi, Rita Sharma, Manoj K. Sharma

Abstract

Sweet sorghum is a promising target for biofuel production. It is a C4 crop with low input requirements and accumulates high levels of sugars in its stalks. However, large-scale planting on marginal lands would require improved varieties with optimized biofuel-related traits and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Considering this, many studies have been carried out to generate genetic and genomic resources for sweet sorghum. In this review, we discuss various attributes of sweet sorghum that make it an ideal candidate for biofuel feedstock, and provide an overview of genetic diversity, tools, and resources available for engineering and/or marker-assisting breeding of sweet sorghum. Finally, the progress made so far, in identification of genes/quantitative trait loci (QTLs) important for agronomic traits and ongoing molecular breeding efforts to generate improved varieties, has been discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 279 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 89 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 9%
Chemical Engineering 12 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Energy 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 103 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,549,338
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#104
of 1,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,287
of 335,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#7
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.