↓ Skip to main content

Lectin of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) promotes selective antitumor effects in human breast cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Techniques, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,762)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
24 X users
facebook
929 Facebook pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Lectin of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) promotes selective antitumor effects in human breast cancer cells
Published in
Biotechnology Techniques, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10529-013-1382-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo G. Monte, Tatiane Santi-Gadelha, Larissa B. Reis, Elizandra Braganhol, Rafael F. Prietsch, Odir A. Dellagostin, Rodrigo Rodrigues e Lacerda, Carlos A. A. Gadelha, Fabricio R. Conceição, Luciano S. Pinto

Abstract

The anti-tumor effects of a newly-discovered lectin, isolated from okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (AEL), were investigated in human breast cancer (MCF7) and skin fibroblast (CCD-1059 sk) cells. AEL induced significant cell growth inhibition (63 %) in MCF7 cells. The expression of pro-apoptotic caspase-3, caspase-9, and p21 genes was increased in MCF7 cells treated with AEL, compared to those treated with controls. In addition, AEL treatment increased the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in MCF7 cells. Flow cytometry also indicated that cell death (72 %) predominantly occurred through apoptosis. Thus, AEL in its native form promotes selective antitumor effects in human breast cancer cells and may represent a potential therapeutic to combat human breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Professor 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 32 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Chemistry 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 36 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#219,937
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#1
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,548
of 223,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.